In a British Columbia decision, a court found a driver liable for a car accident after he suffered an epileptic seizure while driving.

Car Accident Caused by Driver’s Epilepsy

On March 29, 2014, a taxi driver was driving southbound across a bridge in New Westminster, B.C. with a passenger in the back seat. Neither the taxi driver nor the passenger were wearing seatbelts.

At the same time, another driver was driving northbound on the same bridge, with a friend in the front passenger seat. The driver suffers from epilepsy and, as he reached the crest of the south side of the bridge, he suffered a grand mal seizure, crossed through the yellow plastic pylons that separated the north and south bound lanes, and struck the taxi.

The taxi driver suffered a head injury and his passenger became paraplegic. The driver’s passenger also suffered a series of injuries.

All injured parties sued the driver, based on the allegation that he was not taking his medication contrary to medical advice and should have known he should not have been driving and should have foreseen a grand mal seizure.

The driver responded by claiming that the taxi driver and his passenger were contributorily negligent because they did not wear seat belts. He also accused the taxi driver of speeding and other behaviour that contributed to the accident.

Court Finds Driver Liable for Accident

After reviewing the evidence, the court had no doubt as to the liability of the driver, stating:

“There is no question that [the driver] was negligent and is at fault for the collisions. He knew he should be taking his medication. He was warned that he should not be driving if he was not fully compliant with his medication. Yet he drove, particularly on a day when he had already had a focal seizure. It seemed during his testimony that [the driver] was not overly concerned with the accident; it was the effect of the accident on his appreciation of the seriousness of his condition that pre-occupied him.

It is unnecessary to repeat the arguments made by the plaintiffs. I accept that [the driver] should not have been driving, and knew or should have known he should not have been driving. Had he been compliant with his medication, it is unlikely that he would have had the grand mal seizure.”

As a result, the court found that the driver had been negligent and was at fault for the collision.

Turning to the taxi driver’s behaviour, the court first found that there was  no evidence that his choice of bridge, choice of lane, and/or excessive speed had prevented him taking reasonable evasive action to avoid the accident. As a result, the court dismissed these claims against the taxi driver.

Finally, the court turned to the driver’s claim that the taxi driver and his passenger were contributorily negligent by not wearing seatbelts, which the court framed as:

“The issue is: did each of [them] fail to take reasonable precautions to protect himself from the consequences of the [the driver]’s negligence?”

The court stated that both the taxi driver and his passenger had taken a risk by not wearing a seat belt, which a reasonably prudent person would do. While the court acknowledged that both men would have likely suffered injuries even with a seat belt, it found that the severity of their injuries could have been lessened with a seat belt.

As a result, the court found the taxi driver to be 10% contributorily negligent for failing to wear a seatbelt and set his passenger’s contributory negligence at 15%.

Get Advice

Our firm remains committed to supporting our clients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Campbell Litigation is working remotely where possible and making an attempt to limit the need for in-person attendance at our office. We have made this decision to protect the health and safety of our clients, staff and their families. We are not currently accepting unscheduled in-person meetings. As a precautionary measure, if you feel sick or unwell and have an in-office meeting scheduled, please contact our office immediately to make alternate arrangements. We remain fully accessible by email and will continue to respond to voicemail messages. If you have any questions, please contact us at 519-886-1204, or by email to

In the event of serious injury following a car crash, retaining a lawyer can help you to get the long-term support you need from your insurance company and the compensation that ought to be paid by the parties at fault for your accident.

At Campbell Litigation, we investigate your claims arising from a car accident, and we seek the compensation you need to recover from your injuries. In the event you have sustained a catastrophic physical impairment or any permanent, serious impairment of any important physical, psychological or mental function, we will help obtain your insurance benefits and fair compensation from those at fault for the motor vehicle accident. We are experienced in handling cases for the most severely injured. We understand the challenges and worries faced on a day-to-day basis by those dealing with newfound hardships.

Legal advice can help you make sure you have what you need following a car accident. To speak with the Waterloo car accident lawyers at our firm, call us at 519-886-1204 or contact us online. We offer prospective accident clients a free initial consultation.